4 Trgovine · 0+ Izdelki

Primerjava: BFGoodrich Advantage proti Hankook ION Evo proti Kumho Ecsta PS71

Profil testa

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Število testov
14
1
15
Najboljša pozicija
#8
#1
#2
Povprečna pozicija
13.4
1.0
9.0
Najnovejši test
2026
2025
2025
Na voljo velikosti
153
64
225

Mokro

Mokro
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Akvaplaning - prečno
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Prijem na mokri cesti
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Suho

Suho
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Suha zmogljivost
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Obnašanje med vožnjo na suhem
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Udobje

Udobje
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Zunanji hrup
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Udobje
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Stroški

Stroški
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kotalni upor
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometrina
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Cena/vrednost
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava