4 Shops · 0+ Products

Primerjava: BFGoodrich Advantage proti Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ proti Hankook Ventus Evo

Test profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Število testov
14
3
3
Best position
#8
#4
#2
Average position
13.4
4.3
3.3
Najnovejši test
2026
2025
2026
Na voljo velikosti
153
97
60

Mokro

Mokro
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Akvaplaning - prečno
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Suho

Suho
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Udobje

Udobje
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Zunanji hrup
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Udobje
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Stroški

Stroški
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kotalni upor
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kilometrina
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Cena/vrednost
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Popular brands
Nova primerjava