4 Trgovine · 0+ Izdelki

Primerjava: Continental VanContact Winter proti Firestone Roadhawk 2 proti Falken e.Ziex

Profil testa

Continental
VanContact Winter
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Število testov
2
6
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
1.0
4.7
3.7
Najnovejši test
2019
2026
2025
Na voljo velikosti
46
146
34

Suho

Suho
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Menjava voznega pasu na suhi podlagi
Continental VanContact Winter
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Mokro

Mokro
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Sneg

Sneg
Continental VanContact Winter
85%

Udobje

Udobje
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Zunanji hrup
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Stroški

Stroški
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kotalni upor
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Ledena podlaga

Ledena podlaga
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava