4 Trgovine · 0+ Izdelki

Primerjava: Firestone Multihawk 2 proti BFGoodrich Advantage proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Hankook Ventus Evo

Profil testa

Firestone
Multihawk 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Število testov
1
14
10
3
Najboljša pozicija
#12
#8
#2
#2
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
13.4
6.0
3.3
Najnovejši test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Na voljo velikosti
60
153
104
60

Mokro

Mokro
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%

Stroški

Stroški
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kilometrina
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Udobje

Udobje
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Zunanji hrup
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Suho

Suho
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava