4 Shops · 0+ Products
TESTPNEVMATIK.SI

Primerjava: Firestone Multihawk 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Kumho Ecsta PS71 proti Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Multihawk 2Višji srednji razred
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta PS71Višji srednji razred
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexVišji srednji razred
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Število testov
1
1
15
3
Best position
#12
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
1.0
9.0
3.7
Najnovejši test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Na voljo velikosti
60
64
225
34

Mokro

Mokro
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Suho

Suho
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Stroški

Stroški
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrina
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Udobje

Udobje
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Zunanji hrup
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Popular brands
Nova primerjava