Primerjava: Firestone Roadhawk proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex

Višji srednji razred

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Profil testa

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Število testov

21

3

1

5

3

Najboljša pozicija

#2

#1

#2

Povprečna pozicija

11.9

3.3

1.0

2.2

3.7

Najnovejši test

2024

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

164

40

64

63

34

Mokro

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Suho

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Udobje

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Udobje

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Notranji hrup

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Stroški

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kotalni upor

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrina

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Cena/vrednost

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Firestone Roadhawk proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Profil testa

Mokro

Suho

Udobje

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo