Primerjava: Firestone Roadhawk proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Višji srednji razred

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Število testov

21

4

3

Najboljša pozicija

#2

#3

#2

Povprečna pozicija

11.9

12.0

3.3

3.7

Najnovejši test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

164

111

40

60

34

Mokro

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bočne oznake za mokro podlago

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Suho

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Odziv volana na suhi podlagi

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Udobje

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Udobje

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Stroški

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometrina

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kotalni upor

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Cena/vrednost

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Firestone Roadhawk proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Profil testa

Mokro

Suho

Udobje

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo