Primerjava: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Efficient Grip Performance

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Število testov

16

10

4

3

1

Best position

#3

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

6.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Najnovejši test

2023

2026

2025

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

153

104

111

40

34

64

Mokro

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Suho

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Udobje

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Zunanji hrup

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Udobje

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Stroški

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kotalni upor

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrina

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

Mokro

Suho

Udobje

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo