Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Višji srednji razred

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Število testov

10

3

14

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.6

Najnovejši test

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

104

40

188

Mokro

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Prijem na mokri cesti

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Zunanji hrup

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Notranji hrup

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Suho

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Suha zmogljivost

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Stroški

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kotalni upor

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kilometrina

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Cena/vrednost

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Test profile

Mokro

Udobje

Suho

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo