Primerjava: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ proti GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ proti Falken e.Ziex proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Višji srednji razred

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Profil testa

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Število testov

3

23

3

5

Najboljša pozicija

#4

#1

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

4.3

3.3

3.7

2.2

Najnovejši test

2025

Na voljo velikosti

97

176

34

63

Mokro

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Sneg

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Zaviranje na snežni podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na snežni podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Vodljivost na snežni podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Oprijem na snežni podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Suho

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Stroški

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kotalni upor

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrina

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Cena/vrednost

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Udobje

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Zunanji hrup

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Udobje

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ proti GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ proti Falken e.Ziex proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Suho

Stroški

Udobje

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo