Primerjava: Linglong ComfortMaster proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Proračunski

Linglong

ComfortMaster

R13 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

ComfortMaster

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Število testov

1

3

Najboljša pozicija

#8

#2

Povprečna pozicija

8.0

3.3

3.7

Najnovejši test

2024

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

94

40

60

34

Mokro

Linglong ComfortMaster

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Linglong ComfortMaster

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Linglong ComfortMaster

40%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Linglong ComfortMaster

40%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Linglong ComfortMaster

40%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Linglong ComfortMaster

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Udobje

Linglong ComfortMaster

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Udobje

Linglong ComfortMaster

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Linglong ComfortMaster

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Suho

Linglong ComfortMaster

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Linglong ComfortMaster

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Linglong ComfortMaster

40%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Stroški

Linglong ComfortMaster

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kotalni upor

Linglong ComfortMaster

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Linglong ComfortMaster proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

ComfortMaster

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Profil testa

Mokro

Udobje

Suho

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo