Primerjava: Michelin Agilis+ proti Falken e.Ziex proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

Agilis+

R14 – R17

VS

Višji srednji razred

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Agilis+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Število testov

1

3

5

1

Best position

#10

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

3.7

2.2

1.0

Najnovejši test

2019

2025

Na voljo velikosti

32

34

63

64

Mokro

Michelin Agilis+

60%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Michelin Agilis+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Michelin Agilis+

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Michelin Agilis+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Michelin Agilis+

33%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Michelin Agilis+

67%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Udobje

Michelin Agilis+

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Zunanji hrup

Michelin Agilis+

61%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Suho

Michelin Agilis+

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Stroški

Michelin Agilis+

94%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Michelin Agilis+ proti Falken e.Ziex proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Hankook ION Evo

Agilis+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test profile

Mokro

Udobje

Suho

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo