4 Trgovine · 0+ Izdelki

Primerjava: Michelin Agilis+ proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Firestone Roadhawk 2

Profil testa

Michelin
Agilis+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Število testov
1
3
1
6
Najboljša pozicija
#10
#2
#1
#3
Povprečna pozicija
10.0
3.3
1.0
4.7
Najnovejši test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Na voljo velikosti
32
40
64
146

Mokro

Mokro
Michelin Agilis+
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Michelin Agilis+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Michelin Agilis+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Michelin Agilis+
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Udobje

Udobje
Michelin Agilis+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Zunanji hrup
Michelin Agilis+
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Suho

Suho
Michelin Agilis+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Stroški

Stroški
Michelin Agilis+
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrina
Michelin Agilis+
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava