4 Trgovine · 0+ Izdelki

Primerjava: Michelin Energy Saver + proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Profil testa

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Število testov
4
10
3
Najboljša pozicija
#5
#2
#2
Povprečna pozicija
10.3
6.0
3.3
Najnovejši test
2018
2026
2026
Na voljo velikosti
104
40

Mokro

Mokro
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Vožnja po mokrem krogu
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Stroški

Stroški
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrina
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kotalni upor
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Suho

Suho
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Udobje

Udobje
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Zunanji hrup
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava