Primerjava: Nokian cLine VAN proti Hankook ION Evo proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Višji srednji razred

Nokian

cLine VAN

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5

R15 – R21

Primerjaj tudi z

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Profil testa

cLine VAN

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Število testov

1

3

Najboljša pozicija

#4

#1

#2

Povprečna pozicija

4.0

1.0

3.3

Najnovejši test

2019

2025

2026

Na voljo velikosti

16

64

40

Mokro

Nokian cLine VAN

72%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Nokian cLine VAN

77%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Nokian cLine VAN

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Nokian cLine VAN

89%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Nokian cLine VAN

56%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Nokian cLine VAN

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Udobje

Nokian cLine VAN

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Zunanji hrup

Nokian cLine VAN

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Suho

Nokian cLine VAN

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Stroški

Nokian cLine VAN

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometrina

Nokian cLine VAN

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Nokian cLine VAN proti Hankook ION Evo proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

cLine VAN

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Profil testa

Mokro

Udobje

Suho

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo