Primerjava: Nokian WR C3 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Višji srednji razred

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

WR C3

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Število testov

1

3

Best position

#7

#1

#2

Average position

7.0

1.0

3.7

Najnovejši test

2018

2025

Na voljo velikosti

23

64

34

Mokro

Nokian WR C3

31%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Nokian WR C3

25%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Nokian WR C3

25%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Nokian WR C3

33%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Nokian WR C3

33%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Sneg

Nokian WR C3

96%

Suho

Nokian WR C3

60%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Nokian WR C3

62%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Nokian WR C3

53%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Udobje

Nokian WR C3

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Nokian WR C3

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Stroški

Nokian WR C3

43%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kotalni upor

Nokian WR C3

43%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Nokian WR C3 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

WR C3

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

Mokro

Sneg

Suho

Udobje

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo