Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Continental PremiumContact 7

Proračunski

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Profil testa

FourTech Plus

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Število testov

5

3

1

26

Najboljša pozicija

#9

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

12.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Najnovejši test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Na voljo velikosti

24

34

40

64

66

Mokro

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Sneg

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Stroški

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Kotalni upor

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kilometrina

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Cena/vrednost

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Zunanji hrup

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Suho

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Continental PremiumContact 7

FourTech Plus

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Stroški

Udobje

Suho

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo