Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Hankook ION FlexClimate proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo

Proračunski

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Profil testa

FourTech Plus

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Število testov

5

1

3

1

Najboljša pozicija

#9

#1

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

12.0

2.2

1.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

Najnovejši test

2025

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

24

63

27

34

40

64

Mokro

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sneg

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Stroški

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kilometrina

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kotalni upor

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Zunanji hrup

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Suho

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Hankook ION FlexClimate proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo

FourTech Plus

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Stroški

Udobje

Suho

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo