Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Hankook ION FlexClimate proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Proračunski

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Profil testa

FourTech Plus

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Število testov

5

1

3

5

Najboljša pozicija

#9

#1

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

12.0

1.0

3.3

2.2

Najnovejši test

2025

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

24

27

40

60

63

Mokro

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Sneg

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Zunanji hrup

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Suho

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Stroški

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kotalni upor

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrina

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Hankook ION FlexClimate proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

FourTech Plus

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Udobje

Suho

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo