Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

Proračunski

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Profil testa

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Število testov

5

4

3

5

3

1

Najboljša pozicija

#9

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

12.0

3.3

2.2

3.7

1.0

Najnovejši test

2025

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

24

111

40

63

34

64

Mokro

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sneg

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Stroški

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kotalni upor

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrina

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Zunanji hrup

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Udobje

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Suho

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus proti Michelin e.Primacy proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Stroški

Udobje

Suho

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo