Primerjava: Viking Fourtech proti Bridgestone Blizzak 6 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo

Proračunski

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Primerjaj tudi z

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Profil testa

Fourtech

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Število testov

5

14

3

Najboljša pozicija

#11

#1

#2

Povprečna pozicija

17.0

3.6

3.3

Najnovejši test

2021

2025

2026

Na voljo velikosti

32

188

40

60

Mokro

Viking Fourtech

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking Fourtech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Sneg

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na snežni podlagi

Viking Fourtech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Vodljivost na snežni podlagi

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Oprijem na snežni podlagi

Viking Fourtech

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Zaviranje na snežni podlagi

Viking Fourtech

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Stroški

Viking Fourtech

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kilometrina

Viking Fourtech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Cena/vrednost

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kotalni upor

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Udobje

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Zunanji hrup

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Udobje

Viking Fourtech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Suho

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking Fourtech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking Fourtech proti Bridgestone Blizzak 6 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Stroški

Udobje

Suho

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo