Primerjava: Viking Fourtech proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Proračunski

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Število testov

5

3

Best position

#11

#2

Average position

17.0

3.3

3.7

Najnovejši test

2021

2026

2025

Na voljo velikosti

32

40

60

34

Mokro

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Sneg

Viking Fourtech

71%

Stroški

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kotalni upor

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrina

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Udobje

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Suho

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Primerjava: Viking Fourtech proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook Ventus Evo proti Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Profil testa

Mokro

Sneg

Stroški

Udobje

Suho

Dimenzije in cene

Dodaj v primerjavo