4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Število testov
5
18
4
10
3
1
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
6.1
3.3
6.0
3.7
1.0
Najnovejši test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Na voljo velikosti
24
47
40
109
36
66

Te pnevmatike niso bile testirane skupaj v istem testu. spodnje ocene so zbrane iz različnih neodvisnih testov, zato je neposredna primerjava le okvirna.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store