4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Število testov
5
5
18
6
3
5
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
2.8
6.1
4.7
3.7
2.2
Najnovejši test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Na voljo velikosti
24
139
47
146
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store