4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Število testov
5
10
4
6
18
3
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
6.0
3.3
4.7
6.1
3.7
Najnovejši test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2024
2025
Na voljo velikosti
24
109
40
146
47
36

Te pnevmatike niso bile testirane skupaj v istem testu. spodnje ocene so zbrane iz različnih neodvisnih testov, zato je neposredna primerjava le okvirna.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store