Primerjava: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Zgornji srednji

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Roadhawk 2

UltraContact NXT

9.9

R16 – R20

Primerjaj tudi z

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

Advantage

Roadhawk 2

UltraContact NXT

Število testov

14

6

3

Najboljša pozicija

#8

#3

#1

Povprečna pozicija

13.4

4.7

1.3

Najnovejši test

2026

Na voljo velikosti

153

146

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Mokra podlaga

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Akvaplaning - prečno

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Suha podlaga

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Menjava voznega pasu na suhi podlagi

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Udobje

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Zunanji hrup

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Udobje

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Stroški

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Kotalni upor

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Kilometrina

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Razišči lestvice

Best tyres for evs Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo na suhem Najboljše dežne pnevmatike Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo Najtišje pnevmatike Najbolj varčne pnevmatike Najboljše anti-akvaplaning pnevmatike

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Primerjaj tudi

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Continental UltraContact NXT vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Brskaj po znamki

Primerjava: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Roadhawk 2

UltraContact NXT

Profil testa

Dimenzije in cene

Razišči lestvice

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

Primerjaj tudi

Brskaj po znamki

Dodaj v primerjavo