Primerjava: Goodride SA37 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Proračunski

Goodride

SA37

R15 – R22

VS

Zgornji srednji

BFGoodrich

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Profil testa

SA37

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Število testov

1

14

10

4

Najboljša pozicija

#9

#8

#2

Povprečna pozicija

9.0

13.4

6.0

3.3

Najnovejši test

2022

2026

Na voljo velikosti

78

153

109

40

Te pnevmatike niso bile testirane skupaj v istem testu. spodnje ocene so zbrane iz različnih neodvisnih testov, zato je neposredna primerjava le okvirna.

Mokra podlaga

Goodride SA37

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Goodride SA37

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Goodride SA37

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Goodride SA37

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Goodride SA37

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Suha podlaga

Goodride SA37

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Goodride SA37

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Goodride SA37

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Udobje

Goodride SA37

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Zunanji hrup

Goodride SA37

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Stroški

Goodride SA37

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kotalni upor

Goodride SA37

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Razišči lestvice

Najboljše pnevmatike za električna vozila Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo na suhem Najboljše dežne pnevmatike Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo Najtišje pnevmatike Najbolj varčne pnevmatike Najboljše anti-akvaplaning pnevmatike

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Primerjaj tudi

Goodride SA37 vs Westlake Sport SA-37

Goodride SA37 vs Avon ZV7

Goodride SA37 vs Continental SportContact 7

Goodride SA37 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Brskaj po znamki

GT

Primerjava: Goodride SA37 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

SA37

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Profil testa

Dimenzije in cene

Razišči lestvice

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

Primerjaj tudi

Brskaj po znamki

Dodaj v primerjavo