4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Profil testa

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Število testov
5
10
14
Najboljša pozicija
#1
#2
#8
Povprečna pozicija
2.8
6.0
13.4
Najnovejši test
2026
2026
2026
Na voljo velikosti
139
109
153

Mokra podlaga

Mokra podlaga
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Stroški

Stroški
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kotalni upor
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometrina
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cena/vrednost
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Udobje

Udobje
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Zunanji hrup
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Udobje
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%

Suha podlaga

Suha podlaga
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava