Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Zgornji srednji

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Profil testa

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Število testov

10

4

3

5

Najboljša pozicija

#2

#3

#2

#1

Povprečna pozicija

6.0

12.0

3.7

2.8

Najnovejši test

2026

2025

2026

Na voljo velikosti

109

111

36

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Mokra podlaga

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Zunanji hrup

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Suha podlaga

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Stroški

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Kotalni upor

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Kilometrina

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Razišči lestvice

Best tyres for evs Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo na suhem Najboljše dežne pnevmatike Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo Najtišje pnevmatike Najbolj varčne pnevmatike Najboljše anti-akvaplaning pnevmatike

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Primerjaj tudi

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Brskaj po znamki

Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Profil testa

Dimenzije in cene

Razišči lestvice

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

Primerjaj tudi

Brskaj po znamki

Dodaj v primerjavo