Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Zgornji srednji

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Primerjaj tudi z

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Profil testa

Ecsta HS52

WinTech

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Število testov

10

6

23

3

Najboljša pozicija

#2

#11

#1

#2

Povprečna pozicija

6.0

20.8

3.3

3.7

Najnovejši test

2026

2024

2025

Na voljo velikosti

109

59

176

36

Mokra podlaga

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Viking WinTech

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Viking WinTech

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Viking WinTech

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Viking WinTech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Viking WinTech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Zunanji hrup

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Viking WinTech

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Udobje

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Notranji hrup

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Viking WinTech

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Suha podlaga

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Viking WinTech

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Viking WinTech

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Stroški

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kotalni upor

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrina

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Cena/vrednost

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Razišči lestvice

Pnevmatike za avtomobile ev Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo na suhem Najboljše dežne pnevmatike Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo Najtišje pnevmatike Najbolj varčne pnevmatike Najboljše anti-akvaplaning pnevmatike

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Primerjaj tudi

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Viking WinTech vs Radar Dimax Alpine

Viking WinTech vs Giti Gitiwinter W2

Viking WinTech vs Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

Viking WinTech vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Brskaj po znamki

Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

WinTech

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Profil testa

Mokra podlaga

Udobje

Suha podlaga

Stroški

Dimenzije in cene

Razišči lestvice

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

Primerjaj tudi

Brskaj po znamki

Dodaj v primerjavo