4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Število testov
5
3
18
28
5
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#2
#1
#1
#1
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
3.7
6.1
2.3
2.8
Najnovejši test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
Na voljo velikosti
24
36
47
68
139

Te pnevmatike niso bile testirane skupaj v istem testu. spodnje ocene so zbrane iz različnih neodvisnih testov, zato je neposredna primerjava le okvirna.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store