4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Število testov
5
6
4
3
5
5
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
4.7
3.3
3.7
2.8
2.2
Najnovejši test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Na voljo velikosti
24
146
40
36
139
63

Te pnevmatike niso bile testirane skupaj v istem testu. spodnje ocene so zbrane iz različnih neodvisnih testov, zato je neposredna primerjava le okvirna.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store