4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Število testov
5
4
10
3
28
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#2
#2
#2
#1
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
3.3
6.0
3.7
2.3
Najnovejši test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Na voljo velikosti
24
40
109
36
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

PRENESI

Testpnevmatik.si

Brezplačno — v App Store

Primerjajte pnevmatike, preberite rezultate testov in poiščite najboljše cene — vse v eni aplikaciji.

Poglej v App Store