4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Profil testa

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Število testov
4
18
3
Najboljša pozicija
#5
#1
#1
Povprečna pozicija
10.3
6.1
1.3
Najnovejši test
2018
2024
2026
Na voljo velikosti
47
23

Mokra podlaga

Mokra podlaga
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%

Stroški

Stroški
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kotalni upor
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrina
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Suha podlaga

Suha podlaga
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Udobje

Udobje
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Zunanji hrup
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava