Primerjava: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Zgornji srednji

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Vrhunske

Michelin

Primerjaj tudi z

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Profil testa

Line

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Število testov

6

4

1

4

Najboljša pozicija

#6

#3

#1

#2

Povprečna pozicija

12.2

12.0

1.0

3.3

Najnovejši test

2018

2025

2026

Na voljo velikosti

53

111

66

40

Mokra podlaga

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Akvaplaning - prečno

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi

Nokian Line

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Suha podlaga

Nokian Line

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

Nokian Line

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Stroški

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kilometrina

Nokian Line

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kotalni upor

Nokian Line

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Udobje

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Zunanji hrup

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Razišči lestvice

Pnevmatike za avtomobile ev Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo na suhem Najboljše dežne pnevmatike Pnevmatike z najboljšo vodljivostjo Najtišje pnevmatike Najbolj varčne pnevmatike Najboljše anti-akvaplaning pnevmatike

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Primerjaj tudi

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Firestone Roadhawk

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Brskaj po znamki

Primerjava: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Line

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Profil testa

Mokra podlaga

Suha podlaga

Stroški

Udobje

Dimenzije in cene

Razišči lestvice

Priljubljene primerjave pnevmatik

Primerjaj tudi

Brskaj po znamki

Dodaj v primerjavo