4 trgovine · 0+ izdelki

Primerjava: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Profil testa

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Število testov
5
18
5
6
4
3
Najboljša pozicija
#9
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Povprečna pozicija
12.0
6.1
2.8
4.7
3.3
3.7
Najnovejši test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Na voljo velikosti
24
47
139
146
40
36

Mokra podlaga

Mokra podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Vožnja skozi zavoje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Akvaplaning - vzdolžno
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Vodljivost na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Zaviranje na mokri podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Akvaplaning - prečno
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snežna podlaga

Snežna podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Stroški

Stroški
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrina
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Cena/vrednost
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kotalni upor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Udobje

Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Zunanji hrup
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Udobje
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Suha podlaga

Suha podlaga
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Zaviranje na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Vodljivost na suhi podlagi
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimenzije in cene

Primerjajte cene za vse razpoložljive dimenzije teh pnevmatik.

Dodaj v primerjavo

Priljubljene znamke
Nova primerjava