Primerjava: BFGoodrich Advantage proti Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Višji srednji razred

5. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zgledno

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Zgledno

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Dobro

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zadovoljivo

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Zadostno

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 67%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

89%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?