Primerjava: Firestone Multihawk 2 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Firestone Roadhawk 2 proti Continental PremiumContact 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Višji srednji razred

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Višji srednji razred

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.8

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Hankook ION Evo 2025

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zelo priporočljiva

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 Zmagovalec testa

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zadovoljivo

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Hankook ION Evo 87%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Hankook ION Evo ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

100%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

63%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

38%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook ION Evo B

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 E