Primerjava: Firestone Multihawk 2 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Kleber Dynaxer HP4 proti BFGoodrich Advantage proti Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Višji srednji razred

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Višji srednji razred

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Višji srednji razred

5. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Zelo priporočljiva

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Dobro

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Pogojno priporočeno

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Zadostno

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 64%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 56%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 70%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 63%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

77%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

74%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

71%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%