Primerjava: Firestone Multihawk 2 proti Hankook ION Evo proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Continental PremiumContact 7

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Višji srednji razred

5. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Hankook ION Evo 2025

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 Zmagovalec testa

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zadovoljivo

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

3. Falken e.Ziex 87%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

100%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%