Primerjava: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Višji srednji razred

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Višji srednji razred

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zgledno

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Dobro

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zadovoljivo

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Zadostno

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 68%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 82%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 82%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

76%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 84%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 54%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 86%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 65%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 33%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

96%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

91%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

67%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 84%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 98%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C