Primerjava: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti BFGoodrich Advantage proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Višji srednji razred

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Dobro

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Zadostno

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 55%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?