Primerjava: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Nokian WetProof proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Nokian WetProof Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Nokian WetProof 17.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Nokian WetProof 5.64

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Nokian WetProof Zelo priporočljiva

4. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. Nokian WetProof Priporočamo

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Nokian
WetProof

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Nokian WetProof 85%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 91%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Hankook ION Evo A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Nokian WetProof 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 63%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Hankook ION Evo ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

76%

Nokian
WetProof

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?