Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%