Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Firestone Roadhawk 2 proti Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Višji srednji razred

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zelo priporočljiva

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zgledno

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zadovoljivo

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zadovoljivo

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. Falken e.Ziex 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

79%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%