Primerjava: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 55

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Hankook ION Evo 1x

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 2025

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Dobro

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 84%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 76%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 67%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

69%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?