Primerjava: Nokian Wetproof SUV proti Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 27

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian Wetproof SUV 5.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 6.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 5.33

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Nokian Wetproof SUV 2022

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zgledno

4. Nokian Wetproof SUV Dobro

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zadovoljivo

Nokian
Wetproof SUV

80%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian Wetproof SUV 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian Wetproof SUV A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Nokian
Wetproof SUV

79%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Nokian
Wetproof SUV

74%

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 82%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Nokian
Wetproof SUV

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Nokian Wetproof SUV 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Nokian Wetproof SUV 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian
Wetproof SUV

64%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Nokian Wetproof SUV 64%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Nokian Wetproof SUV C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?