Primerjava: Nokian WetProof proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Nokian WetProof Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Nokian WetProof 17.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Nokian WetProof 5.64

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Nokian WetProof Zelo priporočljiva

4. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. Nokian WetProof Priporočamo

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Nokian
WetProof

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Nokian WetProof 85%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 91%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Hankook ION Evo A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Nokian WetProof 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 63%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Hankook ION Evo ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?