3 trgovin, 0 izdelkov

Primerjava: Nokian WetProof proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti BFGoodrich Advantage

Kazalo:

Povzetek
Mokro
Suho
Stroški
Vzajemni testi
Kupi %

#	Nokian WetProof /59%	GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 /78%	BFGoodrich Advantage /62%

Dimenzije	R14 - R20	R15 - R21	R14 - R20
Cena	Nastavite dimenzijo za prikaz cen	Nastavite dimenzijo za prikaz cen	Nastavite dimenzijo za prikaz cen
Odstranite	Odstraniti iz primerjave	Odstraniti iz primerjave	Odstraniti iz primerjave

Segment

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Nokian WetProof Višji srednji razred

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Višji srednji razred

število razpoložljivih velikosti

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

število testov

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

Najboljši položaj v testu

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

Najslabši položaj v testu

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Nokian WetProof 17.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

Povprečni položaj v testih

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Nokian WetProof 5.64

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

Leto zadnjega testa

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Nokian WetProof 2023

Najboljša ocena v testu

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

2. Nokian WetProof Zelo priporočljiva

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Dobro

Najslabša ocena v testu

1. Nokian WetProof Priporočamo

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Zadostno

Mokro

(Splošna ocena)

Nokian
WetProof

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

Akvaplaning - prečno

1. Nokian WetProof 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

Akvaplaning - vzdolžno

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

Vodljivost na mokri podlagi

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

Vožnja po mokrem krogu

1. Nokian WetProof 91%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

Bočne oznake za mokro podlago

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

Zaviranje na mokri podlagi v skladu z oznako eu

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Suho

(Splošna ocena)

Nokian
WetProof

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

Zaviranje na suhi podlagi

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

Vodljivost na suhi podlagi

1. Nokian WetProof 80%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

Menjava voznega pasu na suhi podlagi

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

Obnašanje med vožnjo na suhem

1. Nokian WetProof 71%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

Odziv volana na suhi podlagi

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 75%

3. Nokian WetProof 63%

Udobje

(Splošna ocena)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Zunanji hrup

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

Udobje

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

Notranji hrup

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 69%

Zunanji hrup v skladu z oznako eu

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Nokian WetProof ?

3. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Stroški

(Splošna ocena)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

Kotalni upor

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

3. Nokian WetProof 61%

Kilometrina

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

3. Nokian WetProof 56%

Cena/vrednost

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

2. Nokian WetProof 46%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

Učinkovitost goriva

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Nokian WetProof 78%

Poraba goriva v skladu z oznako eu

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Nokian WetProof C

Dodaj v primerjavo

Izdelava

Model

Primerjava: Nokian WetProof proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti BFGoodrich Advantage

Dodaj v primerjavo

Dodaj v primerjavo

Poletje

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke

Zima

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke

Celoletne

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke

Lestvica

Testi

Blagovne znamke