Primerjava: Nokian WR C3 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Hankook ION Evo 1x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Nokian WR C3 Pogojno priporočeno

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

3. Nokian WR C3 Pogojno priporočeno

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Nokian WR C3 E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Nokian
WR C3

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Nokian WR C3 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

69%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Nokian WR C3 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?